Estonian Photos
We continue our series of photos from the Tartu Ülikooli museum of anthropology in Estonia.
For those who haven't seen my previous posts in this series, a few words of explanation. The museum provides no information about the men, other than the photos came from the Institute of Anatomy at the University of Tartu. In particular, it does not say who these men are, or when or why the photos were taken. However, the photos are labeled "Füüsilise antropoloogia pildistus" (physical anthropology photography).
Who are these men? My best guess is that they are military recruits. The very short haircuts suggest that these photos were taken during or shortly after the enlistment process.
Some of the men in this series have dark faces and hands. Are they are tanned from working outside like farmers, or are they dirty from some dirty occupation? We don't know.
Note: the dark faces and hands are not as visible in today's post as in some previous posts, but darker hands are visible in some of the side views. Perhaps the photos in today's post were taken in the winter, when farmers would not be spending as much time outside getting tanned.
When were the photos taken? My best guess is between World War I and World War II, when Estonia was an independent country with its own military. Before WWI, Estonia was part of the Russian Empire, and after WWII, Estonia was part of the Soviet Union until 1991.
A clue to the time frame is that these photographs were made on glass plates, not film. Dry glass-plate photography started in 1871 and began to fall out of use in the 1920s. I found some references to it in Estonia through the 1930s.
One other clue to the time frame of these photos is that in two previous batches, one of the men is wearing a wristwatch. Wristwatches were considered to be for ladies before World War I. (Men used pocket watches.) However, during the war, wristwatches proved very useful for soldiers and pilots. After WWI, wristwatches came into fashion for men.
Although wristwatches were evidently rare in Estonia (only two men wore a wristwatch among the hundreds that were photographed), it suggests that these photos are post-World War I.
Since the use of glass plates fell out of use in the 1920s, I think the photos were most likely taken shortly after World War I.
Although these appear to be military recruits, these are probably not military photos. We know that the museum that currently has the photos got them from the Institute of Anatomy at the University of Tartu. If these are military photos, why would they end up at the Institute of Anatomy?
I believe the photos were taken by academics doing a study of physical anthropology. Scientists at the Institute of Anatomy were trying to measure what they considered racial characteristics of the population by measuring the body, including phrenology (measuring the skull), ideas which are now discredited.
I think that the scientists at the Institute of Anatomy may have persuaded the military to let them take photographs of the naked new recruits for "research" purposes. I have no written evidence to support this idea, but since the photos were at the Institute of Anatomy, and the photo subjects appear to be military recruits, it's now my best guess as to what happened.
One other question that perennially arises from these photos is: why were the men photographed in pairs? Was it to save film?
The answer is that these photos were made on glass plates, not film, but glass plates were more expensive and involved more labor than film, so yes, it's likely that the men were photographed in pairs to save on glass plates.
So, bottom line: My best guess is that these photos were taken after World War I, the subjects are new or recent Army recruits, and the Estonian military allowed scientists from the Institute of Anatomy to take photos of the naked recruits for a study of physical anthropology.
%20&%20Ricky%20Roman%201b.jpg)
